Advertisement
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM

       

       

         Nestle Water Controversy: It's Time For A Garbage Charge Right At The Till


 

By Terri Chu

Nestle outbidding the town of Centre Wellington for control of a crucial water source demonstrates how cavalierly we’ve been treating our natural resources in Canada.

Paying less than $4 per million litres, Nestle and other water bottling companies are sucking dry groundwater resources at the expense of the next generation. 

Considering that water sells for about $2 per half litre, the paltry sum it is paying to the government is laughable. 

The greed of Nestle may have backfired this time, as Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne has promised to review how water permits are granted in the province.

But that's not enough.

In a country where water flows freely out of the tap, I would argue that selling water should be banned anywhere municipal water fountains exist.

Exceptions can always be made for states of emergency, such as when the Labatt Brewing Company demonstrated how quickly it could turn a beer production line into water canning during the Fort McMurray crisis.   

Though I’d love to see legislation against the sale of water, banning a dumb product would be the antithesis of the capitalist free market values much of this society is built upon.  And you can buy as many Snuggies and “flushable” bum wipes that you want in a free world.  That shows that banning a single item doesn’t solve the problem of other wasteful products.

So perhaps a better market mechanism would be to charge per unit of garbage produced. 

In a dream world, consumers wouldn’t just take products home and dispose of the garbage without ever thinking about it again. 

The cost of garbage should no longer be externalized.  Make it front and center and make it law. 

For example, imagine if each kg of garbage that accompanies a product was paid for at the till?

How many times do we buy a small item at the store only to find it encased in gigantic plastic packaging?

Would the trend of buying sugar water in plastic give way to powders we can pour into reusable bottles at the fountain?  A surcharge large enough to kill the Keurig pod would be every environmentalist’s dream. 

If the government scrapped garbage fees from municipalities and paid for it instead upfront by charging a cost per unit mass at the till, consumers would think twice about buying wasteful stuff. (Products that go full circle like reused beer bottles, cans, and post-consumer recycled packaging could be exempt.)

When nobody sees the cost, nobody conserves.

At $10/kg, an additional 19 cents would be added (at the till) to each water bottle. A $20/kg of garbage surcharge would add 38 cents to the average bottle of water.  That’s 38 cents more than the tax base receives otherwise for getting sucked dry. 

Charging for the mass of garbage at the till also eliminates the need for municipalities to get creative in how to charge for pick up for its most wasteful consumers.  Toronto could get rid of the silly sized-based bins as those producing the most trash already pay for it upfront. 

We could make garbage pickup and disposal free by charging for it at the front end. Efficiencies would skyrocket and waste would likely go down.  

It’s time to stop subsidizing consumption and hit high consumers in the wallet.  A direct, mass- based garbage surcharge internalizes an otherwise external cost. 

Until we stop hiding costs, we will not change behaviours. 

Nestle only highlights the extreme ridiculousness of buying “artesian” water.  We need to create good public policy that strikes at the core of the problem.

Producing garbage is free.  It needs to get more expensive. 

 

Posted date : October 03, 2016
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM
Some say Canada's 150th Anniversary isn't as exciting as it's 100th. But there are many ways to look at important milestones in our nation's history. Randall White explains.
June 27, 2017
The Liberals are limiting solitary confinement to a maximum of 15 days. Are the new restrictions enough, too lenient or too tough? Mahoney, Capobianco and Stewart on that.
June 21, 2017
The next Ontario election is scheduled for June of 2018. But if you're Kathleen Wynne, there's a case to be made for calling a snap election in September for this October.
June 20, 2017
The recent review of Ontario's workplace laws came up with a number of good improvements. But on others it failed, writes Brad James.
June 19, 2017
Supreme Court Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin is retiring on December 15th. What kind of candidates should Canada be looking for? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin explore.
June 14, 2017
A recent Quebec paper argues it may be time to start talking once again about constitutional reform in Canada. Randall White argues that could be good for Ontario.
June 12, 2017
Chrystia Freeland wants Canada to take a leadership role in foreign affairs even as the U.S. steps back. We asked Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin how realistic that is.
June 08, 2017
"There may be trouble in River City" when it comes to the Ontario PCs. Anger inside the party and rumblings of a new movement could affect the leader's election chances.
June 01, 2017