Advertisement
Advertisement
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM

       

       

         Nestle Water Controversy: It's Time For A Garbage Charge Right At The Till


 

By Terri Chu

Nestle outbidding the town of Centre Wellington for control of a crucial water source demonstrates how cavalierly we’ve been treating our natural resources in Canada.

Paying less than $4 per million litres, Nestle and other water bottling companies are sucking dry groundwater resources at the expense of the next generation. 

Considering that water sells for about $2 per half litre, the paltry sum it is paying to the government is laughable. 

The greed of Nestle may have backfired this time, as Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne has promised to review how water permits are granted in the province.

But that's not enough.

In a country where water flows freely out of the tap, I would argue that selling water should be banned anywhere municipal water fountains exist.

Exceptions can always be made for states of emergency, such as when the Labatt Brewing Company demonstrated how quickly it could turn a beer production line into water canning during the Fort McMurray crisis.   

Though I’d love to see legislation against the sale of water, banning a dumb product would be the antithesis of the capitalist free market values much of this society is built upon.  And you can buy as many Snuggies and “flushable” bum wipes that you want in a free world.  That shows that banning a single item doesn’t solve the problem of other wasteful products.

So perhaps a better market mechanism would be to charge per unit of garbage produced. 

In a dream world, consumers wouldn’t just take products home and dispose of the garbage without ever thinking about it again. 

The cost of garbage should no longer be externalized.  Make it front and center and make it law. 

For example, imagine if each kg of garbage that accompanies a product was paid for at the till?

How many times do we buy a small item at the store only to find it encased in gigantic plastic packaging?

Would the trend of buying sugar water in plastic give way to powders we can pour into reusable bottles at the fountain?  A surcharge large enough to kill the Keurig pod would be every environmentalist’s dream. 

If the government scrapped garbage fees from municipalities and paid for it instead upfront by charging a cost per unit mass at the till, consumers would think twice about buying wasteful stuff. (Products that go full circle like reused beer bottles, cans, and post-consumer recycled packaging could be exempt.)

When nobody sees the cost, nobody conserves.

At $10/kg, an additional 19 cents would be added (at the till) to each water bottle. A $20/kg of garbage surcharge would add 38 cents to the average bottle of water.  That’s 38 cents more than the tax base receives otherwise for getting sucked dry. 

Charging for the mass of garbage at the till also eliminates the need for municipalities to get creative in how to charge for pick up for its most wasteful consumers.  Toronto could get rid of the silly sized-based bins as those producing the most trash already pay for it upfront. 

We could make garbage pickup and disposal free by charging for it at the front end. Efficiencies would skyrocket and waste would likely go down.  

It’s time to stop subsidizing consumption and hit high consumers in the wallet.  A direct, mass- based garbage surcharge internalizes an otherwise external cost. 

Until we stop hiding costs, we will not change behaviours. 

Nestle only highlights the extreme ridiculousness of buying “artesian” water.  We need to create good public policy that strikes at the core of the problem.

Producing garbage is free.  It needs to get more expensive. 

 

Posted date : October 03, 2016
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM
The renegotiation of NAFTA resumes this week in Mexico City. What does Canada have to do to save NAFTA - or should it bother? Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin weigh in.
November 14, 2017
A recent series of lectures in Toronto might help Prime Minister Trudeau's search for an path towards reconciliation with Canada's First Nations.
November 12, 2017
Justin Trudeau's fundraiser and former Liberal PMs Jean Chretien and Paul Martin are linked to companies with holdings in offshore tax havens. Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin debate.
November 08, 2017
While populists in some countries say immigration and freer trade have caused inequality inside nations, globally it's a different story. More migration helps.
November 06, 2017
Should all of Justin Trudeau's cabinet ministers - not just Bill Morneau - be required to put their holdings in a blind trust? Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin debate.
October 31, 2017
Critics of Ontario's Basic Income pilot project say the fact it's not universal means it won't achieve economic security where jobs are perilous and scarce.
October 26, 2017
Can indexing the Child Benefit to inflation as Canada enjoys a booming economy change the channel for beleaguered Finance Minister Morneau? Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin are in The Salon.
October 25, 2017
"Evidence-based" decision making is good, but there is much that is not quantifiable to show that bike lanes on Bloor Street should stay.
October 15, 2017
The Liberals are lowering the small business tax rate to 9% as of 2019 as the Finance Minister faces possible conflict of interest accusations. Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin discuss.
October 14, 2017
Critics say Canada is getting beaten up by the Trump administration in the NAFTA negotiations. Is the "charm offensive" failing? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin debate.
October 11, 2017
The NDP has chosen the Ontario-based Singh to head up the party. Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin debate whether it made a smart move.
October 03, 2017
A debate over social injustice being held at the University of Toronto this week features three affluent white men - no blacks, women or other marginalized groups
October 02, 2017