Advertisement
Taking It To The Street

FOLLOW THE MONEY:                                                        

WILL THE TORIES' NEW HEALTH CARE POLICY REALLY MAKE PATIENT CARE THE TOP PRIORITY? 


 Susanna Kelley's new feature looks at how government and party policies will affect the average Ontarian.



Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Tim Hudak is promising to transform the health care system into one where taxpayer dollars are going primarily into patient care.

So what are Mr. Hudak's plans to make that a reality, to bring the average person excellent health care?

Health care is always the number one issue in Ontario polls.  But it never seems to be the ballot question when election day rolls around. 

Health care has also been a migraine inducing issue for every Ontario finance minister that has graced the Frost building on Queen's Park Crescent in Toronto for decades. 

It is eating up our provincial budget at an enormous rate, according to experts in the field. 

And we've all heard how the demands are going to get worse as the population grows and the baby boom generation continues to age.

There are few who know their way around the health care file better than Michael Decter.  Before leaving government, he acted as Deputy Minister of Health in two provinces, Saskatchewan and Ontario.  Then he co-launched the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) before moving on to the private sector.

Mr. Decter says what scares him most about the future of health care in Ontario are those pesky baby boomers.  He recently commented that, as teenagers, their generation stopped the war in Vietnam, and they haven't stopped organizing politically for what they want ever since:

 


 

Mr. Decter says that such a politically organized generation won’t settle for the limited kind of long term care that's available now.  Boomers will want choices, lots of choices.

But who will pay for them?

In 2010 the Ontario government spent over $50 billion on health care. That's creeping up near half the total provincial budget, and it's increased $7 billion in four years. 

Where is all that money going?

According to CIHI, the two biggest drivers of health care spending in Ontario are hospitals - over $17 billion in 2010; and physicians' compensation - over $11.5 billion.

Successive Ontario governments have tried to put the clamps on hospitals, with some limited success.

But the most stubborn cost has been doctors' compensation.

Nationally, the doctors' take-home pay is the fastest rising health care cost.  It's expected to increase by 6.9% this year, according to CIHI figures.

No Ontario party, no matter its political stripe, has ever been able to win when it comes to negotiating remuneration with the Ontario Medical Association for its members.

In Ontario, doctors are paid in a variety of ways.  Some in "family health teams" have a base salary model, others have separate contracts with hospitals and universities.  But the lion's share of physician services is paid for under the Ontario Health Insurance Plan, or OHIP.  It is a fee-for-service model - a doctor gets a certain fee, for instance, for performing hip surgery, a different one for an office visit and so on.  The fees are negotiated in an agreement between the OMA and the government every few years.

The problem with the model is that doctors are their own overseers, controlling how many patients they see and thus, how much money they make. 

A cap on the OHIP fees a doctor could charge annually was dropped some years ago under OMA pressure.

Politicians do not seem to be able to exert any control. Jim Wilson, former PC health minister under Mike Harris, calls the OMA the most powerful interest group in the province. He had to step down in the middle of negotiations in his time in order for the government to get an agreement.

Negotiations with health care professionals are often preceded with a cry of alarm, says Mr. Decter.

"Whether it's the nurses, or the doctors, or the pharmacists ... generally people start negotiations by saying, 'Unless we get what we're asking for, Medicare will end, a crisis will engulf us ... and the solution to it is:  our new contract.'

What ends up happening, he says, is other parts of the health care system, like the Community Care Access Centres, which provide homecare services, get squeezed for money ... and that's what's happening now:

 

 

 

 

Governments are afraid of doctors. Politically, they can't be touched.  That's because while people see teachers and other public servants as self-interested, doctors are revered by the public. If you want to send a government over the edge, just mention the words "doctors' strike."

Which may explain why, when Mr. Hudak was asked several times recently if he would rein in doctors' compensation to free up money for the frontline patient care he is promising, he did not provide a clear answer.

"Well, you know, I'll have more to say about details around our plan in the time ahead.  Today I'm announcing that we're making health care our number one funding priority," he said.

Mr. Hudak promises to shut down Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), which he says have cost $300m so far.  He also pledges to stop the loss of millions on scandals such as the e-health fiasco.

But he also pledges to provide 5,000 new long-term care beds.  He'll keep the 35,000 that are already scheduled to come on stream and commits to spending more than  $6 billion over four years, much of which will be transferred from the federal government.

And he is determined to bring more doctors to communities that need them. 

Judging by past performance, doctors will need a financial incentive to commit to servicing those communities.  That will increase the size of the $11.5 billion they're getting now as the second largest portion of the health care budget.

Mr. Hudak says his policy is to put more health care resources into patient care.

Unless and until he actually provides more details on how that will be achieved, it's hard to see how his policy will actually change things for the average person on the street.

Posted date : June 14, 2011
Taking It To The Street
Would Ontario have lost millions of jobs, and would Canadians have to worry about its government secretly spying on them without warrants, if we'd had a truly democratic system?
October 07, 2013
After two years of the gas plant scandal obsession, Susanna Kelley says the voters' real concern - high unemployment - may finally get the attention it deserves
October 02, 2013
Blame Ontario's conflict-ridden, antiquated political donation rules. It's time the system had a major overhaul, writes ONW's Susanna Kelley.
September 24, 2013
Premier Wynne's new transit panel shows a key difference between the two politicians, Howath tells Susanna Kelley. Actions, not endless talk, will differentiate them next election.
September 19, 2013
Firing those who aspire to your job on the eve of a convention where your leadership is shaky, to say the least, smacks of desperation, not strength, says ONW's Susanna Kelley.
September 16, 2013
Firing the Thornhill MPP for taking a housing allowance of nearly $21,000 for a Niagara On The Lake retirement home won't solve Tim Hudak's credibility gap.
September 09, 2013
And Now, A Dramatic Pause: With Kathleen Wynne and Andrea Horwath's pragmatism, the PC's in disarray, and Stephen Harper in pre-election mode, moderate politics is on the horizon for Ontario.
September 03, 2013
Stephen Harper and Rob Ford share the same damage control strategy, it seems: when in trouble, run away. This is leadership? More from ONW's Susanna Kelley.
May 21, 2013
Will all the political maneuvering leading up to Thursday's Ontario budget avert an election? ONW's Susanna Kelley says we may not know for weeks yet.
April 29, 2013
There's much more to the younger Trudeau's campaign than longing for the more optimistic days of Pierre Elliott Trudeau, says ONW's Susanna Kelley.
April 08, 2013
Kathleen Wynne's vision includes ideas from the PCs, NDP, former leadership rivals and others. Will her consensus politics keep her government afloat?
February 20, 2013
With the first solid evidence in that two women are the frontrunners in the Liberal leadership race, all politicos should note the achievement.
January 14, 2013