Advertisement
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM

Lessons From The Real History Of People's Power In Ontario

 

By Randall White

The “electricity debate” in Ontario “is often driven as much by ‘theology’ as it is by rational analysis."  Thus observed Sean Conway several years ago, former Liberal MPP and well known to be a leading expert in the province's power system.

Some students of the debate today, observing the current controversy over selling 60% of Hydro One to private investors, may nod in resigned agreement. 

A particular public power theology has grown up around the Hydro-Electric Power Commission established by the Whitney government in 1906, under the chairmanship of Adam Beck. 

This theology may have received its fullest expression in a 1960 book called The People's Power: The History of Ontario Hydro. It was written by Merrill Denison, a Canadian radio dramatist of the 1930s who later took up business history.

Denison’s book tells how HEPC (it only officially became “Ontario Hydro” in 1974) used publicly developed electric power to help competitive free markets industrialize, modernize, and rural-electrify Canada’s most populous province, at an attractive low cost.   

When The People’s Power first appeared in 1960 Denison’s story was probably more or less true.

But the rising public enterprise that had evolved over the 54 years from 1906 to 1960 was different from the declining corporate conglomerate that would haunt the 54 years from 1960 to 2014. 

At first, the people’s power company was just exploiting the province’s natural water resources — at such places as Niagara Falls, the Abitibi Canyon and the St. Lawrence Seaway. 

But during the long boom after the Second World War electricity demand proved greater than accessible Ontario water resources could accommodate.

This led to the first coal-fired power stations in the early 1950s. 

Similar demand pressures prompted the beginnings of Ontario’s eventually very important nuclear power system in the early 1960s. The Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station came into service in 1968, followed by Pickering in 1971, Bruce in 1977, and Darlington in 1989.

Thus in the later 20th century, nuclear energy in Ontario expanded to meet a rising share of the province's electricity needs (more than half the total today).

But the costly infrastructure here created a ballooning debt, increasingly difficult to service through electricity revenues alone.

The change from HEPC to the crown corporation officially known as Ontario Hydro in 1974 had also turned the new corporation into more of a publicly owned business organization.

By the 1980s electricity prices were rising in an effort to meet growing financial challenges. By the early 1990s the ballooning debt had induced a major retrenchment. Electricity rates increased dramatically. But the publicly owned business organization was still losing money.

According to one critical school of thought, “As a monopoly, the corporation lacked the competitive pressures necessary to reform itself.”

This was the situation the Harris revolutionaries thought they inherited in 1995. The problem with Ontario Hydro was its rising electricity rates. The solution was to break up the monopoly and establish a competitive market, to bring prices down. 

The Harris government finally set out the beginnings of what we have today with the Energy Competition Act, 1998. This divided Ontario Hydro into five new organizations — the two largest of which are Ontario Power Generation and what is now called Hydro One. 

The original concept was for both OPG and Hydro One to evolve into private companies. And Harris' successor, Ernie Eves, experimented with following through on the full-blown competitive market reform principles of the 1998 Act in the spring and summer of 2002. 

Alas, the experiment failed.

As a Mowat Centre report later explained, during “a prolonged period of very hot weather that summer, the retail market price of electricity shot up, more than doubling ... within a matter of weeks. Consumers screamed and Premier Eves quickly decided to freeze the price of electricity ...  effectively shutting down the competitive electricity system that his government had envisioned. It was never resurrected.”

The subsequent McGuinty and Wynne governments have carried this largely aborted market reform framework forward, without altogether following through on (or denying) its underlying principles either. 

Yet whatever the current virtues of selling off 60% of Hydro One to enhance public revenues may or may not be, it remains a stretch to see either Hydro One or Ontario Power Generation today as torchbearers for the historic ideals of Adam Beck and the people’s power. 

The theology nonetheless romantically lingers on. A recent Mainstreet Technologies poll “has found the majority of Ontarians disapprove of the sale of Hydro One.” 

This support for public ownership in general is a good thing. There could be various new constructive roles for public ownership strategies in the Ontario economic development policy of the next several decades. 

But these strategies also ought to be taking some sober account of what really happened to the people’s power in the province after 1960.

They need to proceed from what Sean Conway calls “rational analysis,” and not even from some wonderfully romantic theology, rooted in a world we have lost.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

About Randall White

Randall White is a former senior policy advisor with the Ontario Ministry of Finance, and a former economist with the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. He is the author of Ontario 1610-1985: A Political and Economic History and Ontario Since 1985. He writes frequently about Ontario politics.
Posted date : May 06, 2015

View all of Randall White's columns
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM
The Inquiry is off to a slow and controversial start. What is holding it up? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on what it will take to succeed.
May 25, 2017
"There may be trouble in River City" when it comes to the Ontario PCs. Anger inside the party and rumblings of a new movement could affect the leader's election chances.
May 24, 2017
The auditor is suggesting the internal culture of the RCMP is so dysfunctional it requires civilian oversight. Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on whether that's a good idea.
May 17, 2017
A Liberal government led by a woman in BC, up for re-election after holding power for more than 15 years. Sound familiar? Randall White on whether there are lessons for Kathleen Wynne.
May 11, 2017
The Liberals are moving left as we near the 2018 election - a reprise of the last provincial and federal campaigns. Will it work a third time? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin debate.
May 10, 2017
This past Earth day, the planet surpassed 400 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 in the atmosphere. Terri Chu laments that as long as polluting is cheap, it will continue unabated.
May 08, 2017
The Defence Minister is accused of lying when he described himself as "the architect" of a major offensive during Afghanistan war. Should he step down? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin debate.
May 03, 2017
Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne's approval ratings have plummeted a year ahead of next year's Ontario election. But not so fast, says Peter Shurman - don't count Wynne out yet.
April 28, 2017
Hamilton, Thunder Bay and Lindsay will be the pilot sites for the Basic Income Project for 4,000 lower-income people. Is it a good idea? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on that.
April 27, 2017
If Ontario really does put Canada first, it has to be a big supporter of the new Canadian Free Trade Agreement scheduled to take effect July 1st. Randall White delves into the details.
April 22, 2017
It's been thrown around for everything from fat paycheques (read Bombardier) to tax credits for creating jobs. Brad James thinks it's time to give the old phrase a rest once and for all.
April 21, 2017
Finance Minister Charles Sousa is promising to act in the province's budget being brought down next week. What exactly should it do? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on that.
April 19, 2017