Advertisement NEWSROOM

                  A Cleaner Environment: If Ontario Won’t Help, Please Just Get Out Of The Way


By Terri Chu

Every time someone mentions a great municipal infrastructure project on the other side of the pond (usually a really progressive nation like Germany or Sweden), I mutter some lame excuse for why Canadians can’t have equally nice things. 

“Our population density is too low,” I might say. Perhaps I will opine “We have so many cheap resources, there's no economic incentive.” 

Small towns in Sweden have reduced their carbon output by having things like district energy systems, energy from waste facilities and stringent building codes. 

So why can’t we have nice things?  I’ve come to conclusion that the overriding factor in municipalities getting nice things is sheer willpower. 

Municipalities like Guelph had incredible mayoral leadership to make its district energy system a reality.  It costs a lot, no doubt, but they are securing the long-term energy future of the town. Guelph did it despite the legislative hurdles it had to go through provincially.  Its residents were on board with the idea of building for the future (that is, until they weren’t.) 

Toronto on the other hand, despite its high density development (often in large swathes, think the Dupont corridor), doesn’t even bother. 

Yes, it will cost developers more to put in environmentally friendly building infrastructure to plan for the future, but why can’t the city demand this? 

When this question was raised recently, city staff simply said they didn’t have the power to compel developments to do this.  They do!  If's in Section 37 of the provincial planning act.

They just have to be creative. Money tradeoffs could be made. In the case of both Guelph and Markham, civic leadership just forced the issue. 

Other towns with great progressive staff and laggard civic leadership often run into hurdles.  I’ve consulted with municipalities where the staff was pushing on a rope to get council on board.  Those projects rarely went ahead. 

That, sadly, is the situation that Toronto faces.  Lots of great staff that understand the challenges a megacity faces, but a municipal government unable to function because of said megacity politics.  So anything above and beyond Ontario’s outdated building codes are an automatic no go. 

It is hard to blame Toronto, given the already difficult situation of an amalgamated council.

But on top of that, Ontario municipalities suffer from a relentless Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) that is committed to protecting developers like the delicate flowers that they are.  God forbid cities force developers to spend a dime extra to ensure long-term energy solutions and the lowering of environmental footprints. 

While Sweden has eliminated many a garbage truck by deploying underground vacuum tubes to collect waste, Toronto is still trying to figure out how to get around provincial laws to get even slightly higher efficiency buildings - or buildings that don’t have falling glass for that matter.

In the absence of strong civic leadership (some have argued that is impossible since the amalgamation of Toronto), it is time for the province to recognize it needs to stop hog tying municipalities (and in particular its biggest city, which is barely functioning as it is) when it comes to planning for its own energy future. It is municipalities that have far more influence over carbon reduction than the province does.  Whether a city invests in more roads or more subways has a lot more direct impact than building windmills.

It is possible for Ontario to have nice things too.  As a wise person once said “Lead, follow, or get out of the way”.  If the province won’t take a proactive approach to helping municipalities, please stop getting in the way of the progressive ones.

Axing the OMB would go a very long way to accomplishing this. 


Terri Chu is an engineer and activist who writes on environmental issues.

Posted date : March 28, 2016 NEWSROOM
The auditor is suggesting the internal culture of the RCMP is so dysfunctional it requires civilian oversight. Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on whether that's a good idea.
May 17, 2017
A Liberal government led by a woman in BC, up for re-election after holding power for more than 15 years. Sound familiar? Randall White on whether there are lessons for Kathleen Wynne.
May 11, 2017
The Liberals are moving left as we near the 2018 election - a reprise of the last provincial and federal campaigns. Will it work a third time? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin debate.
May 10, 2017
This past Earth day, the planet surpassed 400 parts per million (ppm) of CO2 in the atmosphere. Terri Chu laments that as long as polluting is cheap, it will continue unabated.
May 08, 2017
The Defence Minister is accused of lying when he described himself as "the architect" of a major offensive during Afghanistan war. Should he step down? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin debate.
May 03, 2017
Liberal Premier Kathleen Wynne's approval ratings have plummeted a year ahead of next year's Ontario election. But not so fast, says Peter Shurman - don't count Wynne out yet.
April 28, 2017
Hamilton, Thunder Bay and Lindsay will be the pilot sites for the Basic Income Project for 4,000 lower-income people. Is it a good idea? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on that.
April 27, 2017
If Ontario really does put Canada first, it has to be a big supporter of the new Canadian Free Trade Agreement scheduled to take effect July 1st. Randall White delves into the details.
April 22, 2017
It's been thrown around for everything from fat paycheques (read Bombardier) to tax credits for creating jobs. Brad James thinks it's time to give the old phrase a rest once and for all.
April 21, 2017
Finance Minister Charles Sousa is promising to act in the province's budget being brought down next week. What exactly should it do? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin on that.
April 19, 2017
Canada's Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland says Syrian President Bashar al-Assad must go. But who should be the new leader? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin are in the ONW Salon.
April 12, 2017
A 20% border tax on imports into the U.S. is under hot debate among Republicans. What would such a tax do to Canada, coming on top of new NAFTA negotiations? Mahoney, Capobianco and Parkin debate.
April 05, 2017