Advertisement
Advertisement
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM

             Labour Keeps Its Distance From Guaranteed Annual Income, For Now…

 

 

By Brad James

A radical and simple concept:  an effective way to stop people from being poor is to give them enough money not to be poor. In a society as rich as ours, can’t we provide everyone with enough income to ensure their dignity and autonomy?

Discussion about a guaranteed annual income (GAI) is suddenly back in vogue. 

The idea of providing everyone with a guaranteed income paid from public revenue has grabbed attention in Canada at least twice before.  The GAI made an appearance as a proposal (in a very tightfisted form) in the 1985 report from the Royal Commission on the Economic Union and Development Prospects for Canada (better known as the Macdonald Commission). More positively, the encouraging results on health and education outcomes of a more expansive GAI pilot program in Dauphin Manitoba in the mid-1970s caused a lot of stir when they were finally made public in 2009. 

And now the GAI is back, sparked by at least partially by alarm about swelling income and wealth inequality.  Both proponents and skeptics are getting lots of play.

But one voice has been relatively quiet.  The labour movement, usually upfront and vocal on key social issues, has kept a noticeable distance from the present GAI discussion.

The Ontario Federation of Labour, the province’s largest labour group, has no formal position on the GAI, though it is now working on a GAI discussion paper.  The Canadian Labour Congress last addressed this issue back in 1988 with a call for an expansive and comprehensive GAI model. Neither the United Steelworkers nor Unifor currently hold formal policy stances on the matter, and CUPE believes that the CLC’s position from 1988 remains relevant today.

Labour’s caution is worth noticing, especially in Ontario given the provincial government’s announcement that it will kick a GAI experiment into gear in fall of 2016. Liberal governments in Quebec and Ottawa have been making positive sounds as well.

Why might unions, not known for shyness, be holding back?

One reason is that settled opinion about the core idea behind the GAI does not stick to predictable ideological lines.  Progressive opinion does not cohere in either direction.  On the other side of the spectrum, conservatives can be appalled by the idea of simply giving people money, or be infatuated with a GAI’s imaginable efficiency in delivering support to those who need it. 

Next, how a GAI might actually work is still a blank canvas. 

It could be designed to be pinched and parsimonious, or to too deeply erode other vital social programs already in place.  Alternatively, it could be layered into our existing social support landscape as a truly transformative initiative that could take a much-needed bite out of inequality and poverty.

So it may be prudent for labour to wait, to watch and to provide informed input as different models have their tires kicked

It is also likely that labour’s diffidence is rooted in valid worries about a GAI subsidizing lousy employers or distracting governments from making needed progress on policy initiatives to increase the supply of meaningful and fairly compensated employment opportunities for people who can work.  

Another speedbump is taxes.  A robust and comprehensive GAI that also did not cannibalize other worthy programs would require a big jump in government revenue.  And that would mean more taxes from a lot more of us.  Despite some encouraging signs to the contrary, unions are not strangers to the popular notion that tax increases are things that somebody else (usually the unloved pairing called “the 1% and the big corporations”) should pay.  Unions may simply not yet be ready to rally members around a GAI proposal to be paid by more contributions from those very same members.  

As well, how would a GAI impact labour’s collective bargaining power? 

On the positive side for labour, during strikes and lockouts, union members would have a credible income source in addition to their strike pay.

But a GAI’s subsidizing effect for employers might also move the bargaining power needle the other way. 

And finally, coming out squarely in support of an expansive GAI also may mean wrapping minds around a difficult admission that perhaps the primacy of the traditional labour market as the key driver of income distribution may be less and less important in the future. And that could require a challenging, almost existential contemplation about the very nature of unions in the future.

The issues are complex and risky, but unions will not stay for long on the sidelines in the reignited GAI debate.

The opportunities for either exciting social progress or for backsliding and retrenchment are too great.

 

Brad James is the Organizing Department Leader for the United Steelworkers Canadian National Office. He can be reached at bjames@usw.ca  Opinions expressed are his own.

 

Posted date : April 14, 2016
ontarionewswatch.com NEWSROOM
Does Justin Trudeau's attendance in Davos for the World Economic Forum really benefit Canada? Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin weigh in.
January 23, 2018
A recent poll shows Patrick Brown's PCs in a virtual tie with Kathleen Wynne's Liberals for voter support. Are we headed for a minority government?
January 21, 2018
The latest Forum poll shows little change, but trends over the last 18 months say a lot. They may mean a big opening for the Andrea Howath.
January 17, 2018
A new poll says only 37% of Canadians approve of the job the Trudeau Liberals are doing. We asked Richard Mahoney, Will Stewart and Tom Parkin what the numbers really mean.
January 16, 2018
As the Tim Horton's brand takes a national pounding after a franchise counters the minimum wage hike by taking away benefits, labour may become an election issue.
January 15, 2018
Will CPC Leader Scheer's move to kick Beyak out of the CPC caucus hurt him with some supporters? Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin weigh in.
January 09, 2018
Voter participation has been declining in the 21st century. Are Ontario voters interested enough in the upcoming election to vote?
January 07, 2018
What will 2018 bring for each of the three federal parties and their leaders in 2018? We asked Richard Mahoney, Will Stewart and Tom Parkin.
January 02, 2018
A new $15 minimum wage has gotten most of the attention, but there are other significant changes in Ontario's new labour legislation.
December 20, 2017
An Ontario judge has ruled "administrative segregation" should be limited to 5 days only. Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin debate banning it altogether.
December 19, 2017
Is the centre-left getting crowded? The PC's, Liberals and NDP all seem to be targeting voters there. Which will win them?
December 13, 2017
The Liberals won three of four by-elections this week, including a seat in an area they haven't taken since 1949. What do the results mean? Mahoney, Stewart and Parkin debate.
December 12, 2017